Archive for April, 2009
Can Project Length Affect Your Happiness?
by Brian Maddox on Apr.10, 2009, under General
A 2006 survey conducted by PM Network magazine asked the following question of its takers:
Considering all of the projects you have worked on in the past three years, how long do they last, on average, from initial planning to completion? The results found that:
- 43% worked on projects that were less than two months long;
- 36% worked on projects that were more than a year long;
- 14% worked on projects that were six months to a year;
- 7% worked on projects two to six months.
The following year, another survey conducted by PM Network magazine asked the following question of its takers:
What length of project do you most enjoy and/or find most workable?
- 56% enjoyed projects that were six months to a year in length;
- 28% enjoyed projects that were two to six months;
- 16% enjoyed projects that were longer then a year;
- 0% enjoyed projects less than two months.
These studies indicate that the largest percentage of projects that are worked on (43%), last less then two months long and nobody enjoys managing them. Additionally, over one-third of the projects lasted longer than one year, and less then a fifth of the project managers surveyed (16%) enjoyed managing those.
If these studies are correct, only a very small portion (16%) of the project management community enjoys managing a majority (79%) of the projects of the duration that they are being asked to manage.
Does this give the project an unhappy aura to start with, and can this have an impact on the project, its team and the overall project culture?

Project Management Efficiencies
by Brian Maddox on Apr.02, 2009, under Communications, Cost, Ethics and Conduct, General, Human Resources, Integration, Procurement, Project Management, Quality, Risk, Scope, Time, Training
Welcome to PMAdvocate.com!
PMAdvocate.com is dedicated to the betterment of project managers, their programs, projects and profession through the collaboration and sharing of relevant project management knowledge and information.
To that end, let me start off this inaugural blog by first stating some facts, and then, posing a thought provoking question for careful analysis. The Center for Business Practices conducted a study that found that through the implementation of project management tools and techniques, project performance in the following areas could be improved by the following percent:
- Schedule Estimating – 38.6%;
- Customer Satisfaction – 37.6%;
- Strategic Business Alignment – 37%;
- Cost/Hour Estimating – 32.8%;
- Time/Budget – 32.5%;
- Schedule Performance – 32.1%;
- Quality Improvement – 31.9%;
- Labor Hours Performance – 25.6%;
- Cost Performance – 23.8%;
- Response Time – 23%;
- Staff Productivity – 22.8%;
- Time to Market – 21.7%.
Based upon the following survey, shouldn’t project managers be the first employees hired, and the last employees fired, at any company or agency? Additionally, and even in this time of economic turmoil and plunging corporate and government budgets, aren’t companies and agencies obligated to take advantage of the substantial return on investment that could be realized by providing their employees with the appropriate level of project management training?

